Impact of quality of service and effectiveness of manpower on the performance of Life Insurance Corporation of India

 

Partha Sarathi Choudhuri

Research Scholar, Department of Business Administration, The University of Burdwan, West Bengal, India

*Corresponding Author E-mail: partha.choudhuri@gmail.com

 

 

ABSTRACT:

Organizational performance depends on a number of factors where over time these factors varies from one sector to another sector, one nation to another nation and one culture to another culture. Like any other sector, in life insurance sector also customers are directly related with their service providers in different ways. Empirical studies indicated that the proper execution of the performance of any organization is generally influenced by its quality of manpower in the course of their effective works and fulfilling customers’ needs or wishes through providing quality of services. Observing the last five years’ (i.e. 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12) performance of Life Insurance Corporation of India in Burdwan district in terms of the number of employees, agents, policyholders, new policies, premium income (single premium income, first year premium income and renewal premium income), individual death claims, grievances and operating expenses ratio, the researcher in this paper tried to investigate whether quality of service and effectiveness of manpower have any impact on the performance of Life Insurance Corporation of India or not.

 

KEY WORDS: Effectiveness of manpower, Insurance, Performance, Quality of service.

 

 


INTRODUCTION:

Indian insurance sector is one of the rapid developing insurance sectors in the present world and it has a significant impact in the country’s economy. After liberalization, along with one and only public life insurance company namely Life Insurance Corporation of India (LICI), a number of private life insurance companies are presently operating in the Indian life insurance market and providing varieties of services and products to their customers. In 21st century, customers are fully aware of their needs and requirements, expectations, information technology, information technology enabled services and always want to get quality of services as well as efficient and effective works from their insurers. Observing the alarming situation, the insurance companies are now trying to get competitive advantage over their competitors through providing better quality of services to their customers with the help of their knowledgeable and technology savvy manpower and the Life Insurance Corporation of India is no exception to this.

 

From the very early age of the business, the largest public life insurance company LICI has not only taken a number of initiatives to improve the knowledge and skills of their employees but also adopted various approaches to provide a better quality of services to their customers in order to meet the expectations of the customers. In order to survive in the future and to achieve maximum growth in the present competitive life insurance market, LIC is now dedicatedly involved in the development of new strategies to improve their performance in efficient manner. To examine whether quality of service and effectiveness of manpower have any impact on the performance of Life Insurance Corporation of India or not, the current study has been conducted on the life insurance customers of all the 17 branches of the LICI located in Burdwan district, West Bengal.

 

REVIEW OF LITERATURE:

The concept of comparison of service performance with some standard by the customers has been emphasized in both the literature of service quality and satisfaction (Spreng and MacKoy, 1996). About a service the two evaluative judgments made by the customers are ‘Is it of good quality?’ and ‘Am I satisfied?’ (Gabbott and Hogg, 1998). Baker and Crompton (2000) stated that quality is an evaluation of “the attributes of a service which are primarily controlled by a supplier” where according to Meuter et al. (2000), during the service delivery, recovery and personalization of service, the noteworthy relationship of customer-employee makes customers’ satisfaction. Khatibi et al. (2002) indicated that customer satisfaction very much depends on the performance of the employee when they provide service to the customer. Customers’ expectation is the reflection of expected performance (Churchill and Surprenant, 1982) where customers’ perceptions is very much influenced by their past experience, or lack thereof, about a particular service product (O’Neill and Palmer, 2003). Payne (1995) suggested that service companies should keep in mind the importance of service quality variables such as reliability, responsiveness, assurance, empathy and tangibles at the time of consideration of the levels of performance in setting objectives of the customer service. Luarn et al. (2003) stated that in life insurance industry, the degree of success in the implementation of enterprise mobilization is positively correlated to the management performance of external aspects like providing increased customer satisfaction. Though the study of Choudhuri (2013) pointed out that in the last visit to the LIC branch almost all the customers were happy about the services offered by the LIC but in the insurance industry, the widespread customer dissatisfaction stemming from poor service design and delivery is confirmed by the studies of Wells and Stafford (1995); Cooper and Frank’s (2001) the Chartered Property Casualty Underwriters (CPCU) longitudinal studies and Friedman’s (2001a, 2001b) the Quality Insurance Congress (QIC) as well as the Risk and Insurance Management Society (RIMS). From the study of the National Association of Life Underwriters, the financial stability of the company, reputation of the insurer, agent integrity and the quality of information and guidance from the agent were extracted as the four important factors of the insurance quality (King, 1992). Crosby and Cowles (1986); Clow and Vorhies (1993); Richard and Allaway (1993) specified that in 80% of the cases, an insurance policy is almost always sold by an agent who is the customer’s only contact. Joseph et al. (2003) pointed out that insurance agents should constantly monitor the level of satisfaction among his / her customers to keep themselves close to the customers for fulfilling their needs. According to Pointek (1992), customers want more responsive agents with better contact, personalized communications from the insurer, accurate transactions, and quickly solved problems which were identified in customer surveys by Prudential. Berry (1995) pointed out that in order to reduce risks and uncertainties, customers seek long-term relationships with their insurance companies and respective agents because of the amount of money that is typically invested in an insurance policy. Thus, Harrison (2003) revealed that the industry considers that after the initial purchase, understanding customers’ behavior will help the insurers to maintain longer customer-insurer relations.

 

 

METHODOLOGY:

The current study was carried out based on the both primary and secondary data sources. In order to observe the branch wise performance of Life Insurance Corporation in Burdwan district in last five years (i.e. 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12), initially researcher collected secondary data from all the 17 LICI branches spread over the district of Burdwan on the basis of different parameters like number of employees, number of agents, number of policyholders, number of new policies, premium income (single premium income, first year premium income and renewal premium income), individual death claims, grievances and the operating expenses ratio. For the purpose of the study, researcher has also developed following null and alternative hypothesis:

 

H0: Performance of LICI is independent of quality of service and effectiveness of manpower.

Ha: Performance of LICI is dependent of quality of service and effectiveness of manpower.

 

To collect the primary data, initial questionnaire was developed as a survey instrument where along with the other items, performance of the insurer against the clients’ ideal services, quality of services offered by the insurer and the effectiveness of its manpower were included. The pilot study was conducted in the district town Burdwan where researcher randomly selected 30 customers. After explaining objectives and purpose of the study, researcher tried to get valuable feedback from these customers. Based on this pilot study, the preliminary analysis established the internal consistency of the items within questionnaire and gave the confirmation of validity and reliability of final survey instrument. The structure of the questionnaire is both open-ended and close-ended and consisted seven point Likert scale ranging from 1-strongly disagree to 7-strongly agree. After successfully completion of the pilot study, considering different demographic profile of the respondents and using random sampling technique, selecting all the 17 LIC branches located in Burdwan district, total 350 questionnaires were distributed among the customers where 289 customers were agreed to give response and finally obtained 221 usable responses which were considered as the sample size for this study. Here, statistical package SPSS 16 was used to perform the analyses.

 


 

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS:

To observe the performance of Life Insurance Corporation of India (LICI), first of all the branch wise information about the total number of LIC employees for the last five years is given below:

 

Table 1: Number of Employees

Branch Name

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

Burdwan Br. 1

71

68

67

68

70

Burdwan Br. 2

53

55

57

56

57

Burdwan Br. 3

30

29

30

31

31

Kalna

56

53

55

52

56

Katwa

51

52

52

53

55

Memari

52

52

54

53

50

Panagarh

37

36

37

36

37

Raniganj

49

49

50

48

51

Asansol CAB

25

25

25

24

23

Asansol Br. 1

62

60

57

55

56

Asansol Br. 2

65

60

57

54

54

Kulti

33

31

32

33

35

Ushagram

40

41

39

39

42

Chittaranjan

43

42

42

41

44

Durgapur Br. 1

68

63

61

55

52

Durgapur Br. 2

56

59

55

55

57

Ukhra

56

54

52

53

53

Source: LICI

 

From the above table it is easy to understand that among all 17 branches from 2007-08 to 2011-12 Burdwan Branch - 1 has highest number of employees (71, 68, 67, 68 and 70 in respective years). In 2011-12, LIC has total 823 employees where in 2007-08, LIC had total 847 employees in Burdwan district i.e. 2.83% employees has decreased in last five years.

The branch wise information about the total number of LIC agents for the last five years is given below:

 

 

Table 2: Number of Agents

Branch Name

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

Burdwan Br. 1

893

966

1002

956

961

Burdwan Br. 2

680

767

802

820

790

Burdwan Br. 3

434

427

419

397

394

Kalna

776

904

922

919

835

Katwa

1023

1181

1183

1122

1136

Memari

707

734

737

691

691

Panagarh

319

346

373

476

425

Raniganj

631

738

738

721

660

Asansol CAB

189

221

240

257

195

Asansol Br. 1

458

471

476

472

445

Asansol Br. 2

438

453

466

437

435

Kulti

283

331

375

351

325

Ushagram

451

492

496

419

458

Chittaranjan

442

539

548

483

506

Durgapur Br. 1

582

644

686

643

731

Durgapur Br. 2

664

679

715

709

691

Ukhra

648

756

745

690

668

Source: LICI

 

From Table 2 it is easy to specify that among all 17 branches from 2007-08 to 2011-12 Katwa Branch has highest number of agents (1023, 1181, 1183, 1122 and 1136 in respective years).

The branch wise information about the total number of LIC policyholders for the last five years is given below:

 

 

Table 3: Number of Policyholders

Branch Name

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

Burdwan Br. 1

338337

362955

391243

414767

435502

Burdwan Br. 2

279399

308524

339331

363236

383440

Burdwan Br. 3

54471

64673

76258

88269

98965

Kalna

295913

324536

358288

387247

410684

Katwa

318261

347614

383012

415244

443991

Memari

287654

309125

331876

352884

371739

Panagarh

128352

142695

159802

174596

187702

Raniganj

12004

14568

15670

15823

14149

Asansol CAB

3280

4496

5387

5361

4057

Asansol Br. 1

7406

9403

10748

10751

9663

Asansol Br. 2

5201

7335

8552

8132

6570

Kulti

3282

5499

6383

5505

5224

Ushagram

5402

7867

10396

9800

8717

Chittaranjan

6830

9731

12346

11031

9196

Durgapur Br. 1

11896

13279

16638

17058

16599

Durgapur Br. 2

10271

12782

16010

14972

13891

Ukhra

11095

14386

17713

16738

14888

Source: LICI

 

 

Table 3 indicates that among all 17 branches from 2007-08 to 2009-10 Burdwan Branch 1 had highest number of policyholders (338337, 362955 and 391243 in respective years) whereas in 2010-11 and 2011-12, Katwa branch has the highest number of policyholders (415244 and 443991 in respective years).

The branch wise information about the total number of new LIC policies for the last five years is given below:

 

 

Table 4: Number of New Policies

Branch Name

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

Burdwan Br. 1

25263

24275

27885

23180

20594

Burdwan Br. 2

33372

29134

30782

23852

20232

Burdwan Br. 3

9607

10247

11618

12001

10702

Kalna

27678

28588

33696

28869

23455

Katwa

28671

29316

35325

32175

28747

Memari

22102

21396

22674

20945

18941

Panagarh

13782

14281

17058

14760

13134

Raniganj

21604

21757

22274

21438

17964

Asansol CAB

8136

6964

8285

7225

5209

Asansol Br. 1

18210

15233

16568

14729

12374

Asansol Br. 2

11105

11112

12254

10960

8457

Kulti

7921

9006

10365

8229

7390

Ushagram

11728

12182

14983

13229

11278

Chittaranjan

14715

15020

18526

15027

11854

Durgapur Br. 1

18873

18817

22502

22283

21129

Durgapur Br. 2

16721

17647

21333

18877

14911

Ukhra

19076

20914

24658

22425

18904

Source: LICI

 

 

Table 4 shows that among all 17 branches though in 2007-08 Burdwan Branch 2 issued highest number of new LIC policies (33372) but from 2008-09 to 2011-12 Katwa branch has issued highest number of new LIC policies (29316, 35325, 32175 and 28747 in respective years).

 

The branch wise information about the single premium income (which is collected once in the policy at commencement of the policy) in terms of Rs. crore for the last five years is given below:

 

Table 5: Single Premium Income

Branch Name

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

Burdwan Br. 1

11.17

10.60

23.09

18.97

10.97

Burdwan Br. 2

0.14

0.79

0.15

1.79

2.71

Burdwan Br. 3

2.31

3.02

5.35

6.26

4.80

Kalna

8.73

10.78

0.19

4.02

1.52

Katwa

2.21

2.38

2.57

2.76

4.14

Memari

9.32

8.76

9.88

5.62

2.69

Panagarh

6.9

2.67

11.28

10.05

4.59

Raniganj

*

*

1.67

1.75

4.63

Asansol CAB

*

*

1.07

1.15

2.54

Asansol Br. 1

*

*

2.38

1.61

7.33

Asansol Br. 2

*

*

1.51

1.98

3.78

Kulti

*

*

2.68

1.09

1.86

Ushagram

*

*

0.95

1.21

3.20

Chittaranjan

*

*

1.08

1.15

2.68

Durgapur Br. 1

*

*

2.14

2.86

8.94

Durgapur Br. 2

*

*

1.69

1.77

5.50

Ukhra

*

*

0.92

1.36

4.23

* Information is not available due to transition from one operating system to another

Source : LICI

 

Referring to Table 5 it may be noted that among all 17 branches though in 2008-09 Kalna branch had the highest single premium income (10.78 cr.) but in 2007-08 and from 2009-10 to 2011-12 Burdwan Branch 1 has recorded highest single premium income (11.17 cr., 23.09 cr., 18.97 cr. and 10.97 cr. in respective years).

The branch wise information about the first year premium income (which is the total of risk premium and other first year premium) in terms of Rs. crore for the last five years is given below:

 

 

Table 6: First Year Premium Income

Branch Name

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

Burdwan Br. 1

14.49

15.08

17.15

17.77

19.42

Burdwan Br. 2

6.77

9.24

6.77

11.76

5.80

Burdwan Br. 3

4.56

4.76

5.78

7.38

8.42

Kalna

6.54

8.40

13.55

13.44

15.81

Katwa

10.54

12.02

13.70

15.61

20.11

Memari

5.92

6.87

10.67

13.12

13.34

Panagarh

2.59

2.69

10.6

11.90

14.10

Raniganj

*

*

5.37

5.62

6.13

Asansol CAB

*

*

1.12

1.04

2.36

Asansol Br. 1

*

*

3.61

3.89

7.89

Asansol Br. 2

*

*

2.95

2.79

5.83

Kulti

*

*

1.94

2.10

3.81

Ushagram

*

*

2.87

2.96

3.93

Chittaranjan

*

*

4.21

4.48

6.56

Durgapur Br. 1

*

*

5.06

8.92

11.99

Durgapur Br. 2

*

*

5.18

6.39

10.65

Ukhra

*

*

7.67

7.93

11.62

* Information is not available due to transition from one operating system to another

Source: LICI

 

 

It is pointed out from Table 6 that among all 17 branches from 2007-08 to 2010-11 Burdwan Branch 1 had recorded the highest first year premium income (14.49 cr., 15.08 cr., 17.15 cr. and 17.77 cr. in respective years) whereas in 2011-12 Katwa branch has recorded the highest first year premium income (20.11 cr.).

The branch wise information about the renewal premium income (premium collected which are due from second year onwards) in terms of Rs. crore for the last five years is given below:

 

Table 7: Renewal Premium Income

Branch Name

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

Burdwan Br. 1

62.48

67.19

70.73

77.65

79.98

Burdwan Br. 2

43.43

47.57

43.43

49.11

58.84

Burdwan Br. 3

10.83

11.42

14.05

15.87

16.72

Kalna

41.96

45.14

49.66

62.57

61.39

Katwa

43.76

49.89

56.82

64.71

66.65

Memari

42.54

48.67

48.49

60.77

60.39

Panagarh

15.50

15.56

20.12

21.90

24.06

Raniganj

*

*

58.18

62.62

70.63

Asansol CAB

*

*

14.45

14.76

15.42

Asansol Br. 1

*

*

48.01

57.52

55.73

Asansol Br. 2

*

*

36.74

40.67

39.43

Kulti

*

*

17.92

20.99

21.27

Ushagram

*

*

28.48

30.46

33.55

Chittaranjan

*

*

27.94

34.45

36.87

Durgapur Br. 1

*

*

68.01

75.66

76.57

Durgapur Br. 2

*

*

63.44

72.69

81.04

Ukhra

*

*

58.48

66.83

70.89

* Information is not available due to transition from one operating system to another

Source: LICI

 

From Table 7 it is clear to understand that among all 17 branches from 2007-08 to 2010-11 Burdwan Branch 1 had recorded the highest renewal premium income (62.48 cr., 67.19 cr., 70.73 cr. and 77.65 cr. in respective years) whereas in 2011-12 Durgapur Branch 2 has recorded the highest renewal premium income (81.04 cr.).

The branch wise information about the total individual death claims in LIC for the last five years is given below:

 

Table 8: Individual Death Claims

Branch Name

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

Burdwan Br. 1

489

479

535

565

579

Burdwan Br. 2

319

389

405

557

529

Burdwan Br. 3

52

77

84

103

99

Kalna

363

486

390

470

581

Katwa

415

422

429

615

618

Memari

321

364

347

516

483

Panagarh

120

144

241

208

212

Raniganj

476

473

578

494

577

Asansol CAB

143

115

116

104

166

Asansol Br. 1

554

443

497

528

524

Asansol Br. 2

325

329

315

323

313

Kulti

251

177

200

223

270

Ushagram

268

199

250

269

313

Chittaranjan

222

283

380

390

366

Durgapur Br. 1

559

436

507

612

638

Durgapur Br. 2

384

348

358

411

468

Ukhra

709

838

637

812

694

Source: LICI

 

 

Table 8 indicates that among all 17 branches from 2007-08 to 2011-12 highest individual death claims in LIC has taken placed in Ukhra branch (709, 838, 637, 812 and 694 in respective years).

The branch wise information about the total number of complaints received as well as resolved by the LIC for the last five years is given below:

 

Table 9: Number of Complaints Received and Resolved

Branch Name

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

Burdwan Br. 1

0

0

0

0

23

Burdwan Br. 2

2

1

2

1

13

Burdwan Br. 3

1

2

1

3

8

Kalna

*

0

0

0

5

Katwa

0

0

3

2

13

Memari

3

5

2

4

10

Panagarh

0

0

0

0

8

Raniganj

14

9

7

6

8

Asansol CAB

6

6

2

2

7

Asansol Br. 1

9

12

23

20

8

Asansol Br. 2

17

13

18

20

12

Kulti

5

3

4

2

6

Ushagram

4

4

1

4

4

Chittaranjan

4

8

3

1

1

Durgapur Br. 1

8

8

12

11

4

Durgapur Br. 2

3

15

10

7

3

Ukhra

14

21

22

18

6

* Information is not available

Source : LICI

 

Table 9 illustrates that in the year 2007-08 Asansol Branch 2 received as well as resolved highest number of complaints (17) whereas in 2008-09 Ukhra branch, in 2009-10 Asansol Branch 1, in 2010-11 Asansol Branch 1 and 2 and in 2011-12 Burdwan Branch 1 had received as well as resolved highest number of complaints (21, 23, 20 and 23 in respective years). Figure ‘0’ means no complaint was received by the branch i.e. disposal and pending results ware also ‘0’. So, above table indicates that there was no pending complaint at the year ends.

 

The branch wise information about the operating expenses ratio which is the ratio of operating expenses to the premium underwritten by the LIC for the last five years is given in the following table in form of percentage:

 

Table 10: Operating Expenses Ratio

Branch Name

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

Burdwan Br. 1

11.23

13.45

12.83

13.27

12.75

Burdwan Br. 2

13.72

13.63

14.67

20.28

15.91

Burdwan Br. 3

15

16.24

14.73

20.08

20

Kalna

13.95

12.69

8.40

9.57

8.49

Katwa

13.25

14.19

15.11

17.08

16.19

Memari

15.24

15.68

15.5

14.36

16.3

Panagarh

15.89

16.01

17.10

22.57

18.38

Raniganj

*

*

13.78

17.13

14.85

Asansol CAB

*

*

15.71

20.73

17.82

Asansol Br. 1

*

*

13.46

15.62

13.75

Asansol Br. 2

*

*

13.81

17.69

14.96

Kulti

*

*

15.11

20.40

16.70

Ushagram

*

*

15.79

22.55

16.66

Chittaranjan

*

*

18.31

18.60

16.07

Durgapur Br. 1

*

*

13.79

16.29

14.71

Durgapur Br. 2

*

*

13.02

15.20

13.20

Ukhra

*

*

14.16

16.35

14.17

* Information is not available due to transition from one operating system to another

Source: LICI

 

From Table 10 it is simple to understand that in the year 2007-08, 2010-11 and in 2011-12 Panagarh branch recorded the highest operating expenses ratio (15.89%, 22.57% and 18.38% in respective years) whereas in 2008-09 Burdwan Br. 3 and in 2009-10 Chittaranjan branch had highest operating expenses ratio (16.24% and 18.31% in respective years).

The demographic data of the customers which was collected through cross-sectional survey for the purpose of the study is now given below:

 

Table 11: Demographic profile of the customers

Demographic Variable

Demographic Characteristics

Frequency

Gender

Male

192 ( 86.9 )

Female

29 ( 13.1 )

Age

≤ 30 years

51 ( 23.1 )

31 - 40 years

66 ( 29.9 )

41 - 50 years

38 ( 17.2 )

51 - 60 years

49 ( 22.2 )

≥ 60 years

17 ( 7.7 )

Income

≤ Rs.14999.00

30 ( 13.6 )

Rs.15000.00 -Rs.24999.00

102 ( 46.2 )

Rs.25000.00 -Rs.44999.00

70 ( 31.7 )

≥ Rs.45000.00

19 ( 8.6 )

Occupation

Salaried

174 ( 78.7 )

Business

15 ( 6.8 )

Professional

11 ( 5.0 )

Retired

18 ( 8.1 )

Housewife

3 ( 1.4 )

Educational Qualifications

High school

14 ( 6.3 )

Graduate

56 ( 25.3 )

Post-graduate

38 ( 17.2 )

Professional

98 ( 44.3 )

Any other

15 ( 6.8 )

Locality of Living

Center of the town

144 ( 65.2 )

Outskirts of the town

30 ( 13.6 )

Rural areas adjoining town

47 ( 21.3 )

Modern Aids

Mobile Phone

64 ( 29.0 )

Combination of mobile and internet

157 ( 71.0 )

* Percentage (%) in parenthesis

 

To understand the strength of the relationship of performance of LICI, quality of service and effectiveness of manpower, the researcher has performed multiple regression analysis where the prediction of the dependent variable would be done by the two independent variables (predictors). Here, performance of LICI was considered as a dependent variable and quality of service as well as effectiveness of manpower of LICI were considered as the independent variables for the study. The results of regression analysis are presented in the following tables:

 

Table 12: Variables Entered/Removedb

Model

Variables Entered

Variables Removed

Method

1

SERVICE QUALITY, EFFECTIVENESSª

.

Enter

a. All requested variables entered.

b. Dependent Variable: PERFORMANCE

 

Table 13: Model Summaryb

Model

R

R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the Estimate

1

.720ª

.518

.514

.84865

a. Predictors: (Constant), SERVICE QUALITY, EFFECTIVENESS

b. Dependent Variable: PERFORMANCE

 

Table 14: Result of ANOVA

ANOVAb

Model

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F

Sig.

1

Regression

168.706

2

84.353

117.123

.000ª

Residual

157.005

218

.720

 

 

Total

325.710

220

 

 

 

a. Predictors: (Constant), SERVICE QUALITY, EFFECTIVENESS

b. Dependent Variable: PERFORMANCE

Table 15: Regression Coefficients

Coefficientsª

Model

Unstandardized

Coefficients

Standardized

Coefficients

t

Sig.

B

Std. Error

Beta

1

(Constant)

.557

.345

 

1.614

.008

SERVICE QUALITY

.292

.075

.185

3.910

.000

EFFECTIVENESS

.680

.048

.672

14.163

.000

a. Dependent Variable: PERFORMANCE

 


 

 

 

The result of the regression analysis indicates that the dependent variable performance is strongly related with the independent variables service quality and effectiveness, i.e., prediction of dependent variable has successfully done by the two independent variables. The value of R Square = 0.518 in Table 13 indicates the significance of the study. In ANOVA result of Table 14, the value of F = 117.123, p≤0.001 established the significance of the relationship among the performance of LICI, quality of services offered by the LIC and effectiveness of its manpower. The result of regression coefficients are shown in Table 15 where the standardized coefficient β and corresponding t-value of service quality are β = 0.185, t = 3.910, p<0.001 and the standardized coefficient β and corresponding t-value of effectiveness of manpower are β = 0.672, t = 14.163, p<0.001 which also proved that there exists positive and strong relationship among the one dependent variable (performance of LICI) and two independent variables (quality of service and effectiveness of manpower) of the study. So, at present study the null hypothesis is rejected and alternative hypothesis “Performance of LICI is dependent of quality of service and effectiveness of manpower” is accepted.

 

CONCLUSIONS:

The present study not only describes the perfect positive linear relationship of dependent and independent variables of the study but also reveals the dependency of LICI’s performance against the clients’ ideal services on the quality of services offered by the LICI and the effectiveness of its manpower. In another way, it can be explained that service quality and effectiveness of manpower of Life Insurance Corporation of India play a major role in its performance in Burdwan district. As quality of service done by the effective manpower has a significant impact on the performance of the life insurance company so it is expected that realizing the practical situation Life Insurance Corporation of India should try to arrange more and more need based training programs on a regular basis for their employees and agents so that understanding the specific needs and requirements of the customers they can provide their services accordingly to them in an efficient, effective and well behaved way through which Life Insurance Corporation of India would be able to continue to contribute a major share in the present competitive life insurance market.

 

REFERENCES:

Baker, D.A. and Crompton, J.L. (2000). “Quality, satisfaction and behavioural intentions”, Annals of Tourism Research, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 785-804.

Berry, L. L. (1995). Relationship marketing of services-growing interest, emerging perspectives. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23 (Fall), 236-245.

Choudhuri, P. S. (2013). “Study on the usage behavior and overall satisfaction of the life insurance customers with special reference to the Life Insurance Corporation of India in Burdwan”, JIS Management Vista, Vol. 7, No. 1 (January-June), pp. 79-91.

Churchill, G. A. Jr. and Surprenant, C. (1982). "An Investigation into the Determinants of Customer Satisfaction," Journal of Marketing Research, 19 (November), 491-504.

Clow, K. F. and Vorhies, D. W. (1993). Building a Competitive Advantage for Service Firms. Journal of Services Marketing, 7(1), 22-32.

Cooper, R. W. and Frank, G. L. (2001). Key ethical issues facing the property and casualty insurance: has a decade made a difference? CPCU Journal, 54 (2), 99-111.

Crosby, L. A. and Cowles, D. (1986). Life Insurance Agents as Financial Planners: A Matter of Role Consensus. Journal of Professional Services Marketing, 1 (Spring), 69-89.

Friedman, S. (2001a). RIMS plans to have third quality scorecard published in 2002. National Underwriter, 105(18), 3-22.

Friedman, S. (2001b). RIMS launches quality process. National Underwriter, 105(19), 3-29.

Gabbott, M. and Hogg, G. (1998). Consumers and services. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.

Harrison, T. (2003). “Understanding the behavior of financial services consumers: a research agenda”, Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 6-9.

Joseph, M., Stone, G. and Anderson, K. (2003). Insurance customers’ assessment of service quality: A critical evaluation. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 10 (1): 81-92.

Khatibi, A.A., Ismail, H., and Thyagarajan, V. (2002). What drives customer loyalty: An analysis from the telecommunications industry. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 11(1), 34-44.

King, C. (1992). Agents/policy owners split on service. National Underwriter, 41(October), 7.

Luarn, P., Lin, T. M. Y. and Lo, P. K. Y. (2003). An exploratory study of advancing mobilization in the life insurance industry: The case of Taiwan’s Nan Shan Life Insurance Corporation. Internet research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy 13 (4): 297-310.

Meuter, M.L., Ostrom, A.L., Roundtree, R.I. and Bitner, M.J. (2000). “Self-service technologies: understanding customer satisfaction with technology-based service encounters”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 64 No. 3, pp. 50-65.

O’Neill, M., and Palmer, A. (2003). An exploratory study of the effects of experience on consumer perceptions of the service quality constructs. Managing Service Quality, 13, 187-196.

Payne, A. (1995). The Essence of Service Marketing, Prentice - Hall International (UK) Ltd.

Pointek, S. (1992). Outside interests: making the move from lip service to real service. National Underwriter, 96 (44), 34.

Richard, M. D. and Allaway, A. W. (1993). Service Quality Attributes and Choice Behaviour. Journal of Services Marketing, 7(10), 59-68.

Spreng, R.A. and Mackoy, R.D. (1996). “An empirical examination of a model of perceived service quality and satisfaction”, Journal of retailing, Vol. 72 No. 2, pp. 201-14.

Wells, B. P. and Stafford, M. R. (1995). Service quality in the insurance industry: Consumer perceptions versus regulatory perceptions. Journal of Insurance Regulation, 13, 462-477.

 

 

 

 

Received on 06.01.2014               Modified on 24.01.2014

Accepted on 12.02.2014                © A&V Publication all right reserved

Asian J. Management 5(1): January–March, 2014 page 97-105